Christians and Torture
Posted on 2009.05.01 at 07:41Christians are more likely to back torture - than whom? I asked myself. So after following Jay's link, I went to the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, which did the survey.
The question they asked: "Do you think the use of torture against suspected terrorists in order to gain important information can often be justified, sometimes be justified, rarely be justified, or never be justified?"
The Pew material doesn't give "Christians vs. everyone else" breakdowns. The Christians involved are white evangelical Protestants (62% answer "often or sometimes"), white non-Hispanic Catholics (51%), and white mainline Protestants (46%); the non-Christians have one group, "the Unaffiliated" (40%) There's also a summary line for the population as a whole (49%). In all other categories, sample size was too small to report.
White mainline Protestants are actually less likely to "back torture" than the population as a whole, which is some small comfort. The big bump is from evangelicals, who are more likely than the population. All of the Christian groups are "more likely to back torture" than the single category of Unaffiliated.
Then I tried to find the margin of error for the survey; 742 respondents seemed like an awfully small sample size to me, and the largest group they split out - evangelicals - included only 174 respondents. Pew didn't give the margin of error. However, their first report on this survey split out other demographics. There, the closest group to this sample size was 188 respondents. For that group, the margin of error was plus-or-minus 8% to give a 95% confidence level. In other words, if we want to be 95% sure the survey is accurate, we should read the line as:
41%-57% of the U.S. population answer "often or sometimes."
54%-70% of evangelicals
43%-59% of white non-Hispanic Catholics
38%-54% of white mainline Protestants
32%-48% of the unaffiliated
Which is still stunningly bad, I think. Those of us who are involved in churches may want to bring this up.
My own take? Obviously, followers of Jesus do not torture.
Those who justify torture often use the "ticking bomb" scenario: "If a terrorist nuclear device was about to explode in New York City and your captive knew where it was, wouldn't you use any possible means to find out?" Well. Let's suppose two things: 1. I decide to torture, and 2. I get accurate information (which is actually unlikely) and save New York City. The proper thing for me to do is turn myself in as a lawbreaker and be prosecuted for it. That's what happened at civil rights sit-ins and marches; demonstrators deliberately broke unjust laws and were arrested for it, in order to demonstrate that the law was wrong.
